Will Schade
1. Does he purposely spell incorrectly?
2. Why does he choose to tell stories in his artwork?
3. Has art history had an effect on his style of work because it all looks very aged?
I personally love how all of his pieces look aged. The first piece shown is of St. Seabastion's Ravin. It's smart how the raven is supposed to represent the Devil feeding on corruption, opposite of the dove and it's innocence which in turn represents God. His symoblism is uncanny. Furthermore, his subject matter is interesting, for someone who is borderline illiterate he sure does know his sacred texts and noble themes.
Aaah, he is severly dyslexic. For someone who has such a handicap and still want to make art, that's perseverance. Also, most artists dont use text in their work, but Schade, even with his handicap wants to incorporate his misspellings into his work. I guess it gives his work character and makes it easy to distinguish from others. His misspellings are more noticable then the actual subject matter of his work itself. I mean, a lot of it has vulgar scenes being enacted, such as vomitting and masturbation and putting these noble figures up on a negative pedastle are overlooked by his spelling. I find that interesting. Admittedly, that was the first think I noticed about his work, it is very eyecatching.
What I also find neat is that his handwriting looks very childlike and scratchy, like he has trouble keeping his hand still. But then you notice the drawing itself and it is very controlled and precise. It's like his skill ocntradicts itself. This itself causes audiences, me included, to find his work funny instead of respecting his honesty or ridiculing his limitations. Unique, indeed.
Obviously he spells incorrectly because he is severely dyslexic. He chooses to tell stories in his artwork becauase he has a fascination with the sacred texts and noble themes and I dont' think art history has any effect on his style, if anything its what I mentioned before.
1. Why does he choose to use text in his artwork when he knows he cant spell correctly?
2. Why started his interest with sacred texts and noble themes?
3. Does he sometimes secretly wish that he wasnt severly dyslexic?
Showing posts with label Text Commentary. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Text Commentary. Show all posts
Sunday, April 27, 2008
Matthew Ritchie
1. Does he prefer doing installations or paintings?
2. Are his pieces abstract?
3. What is your relationships with the galleries?
I like how his artwork has different functions, as in to teach and entice us to participate. It's also very complex that is usually overwhelms the viewers, he showcases and extends his audience with so much information we cant soak it all in. It's fascinating. Here's a guy who has ambition. He will stop at nothing to get and learn and do what he wants. "He wants everything." I like how he incorporates this idea of "everything" into his artwork. He starts with the time before the big bang and then works from there. How exactly does one do that with out their head exploding. Where do you begin to make such artwork, thats a lot of research.
I also think it's fascinating that he presents a key to each of his pieces. It's almost like a game, its how to unlock the meaning behind his work and for work so complex and intertwined with information, a key isnt such a bad idea. I would love to sit in front of one of his works and try to decode it and break it down, discover the meanind behind the artwork. I also like how he uses characters to narrate the universe's evolution since the birth of time.
I like he he creates "epic tales" through his artwork. And also how it takes place no where, there are no boundaries of limits holding it down, it is what it wants and needs to be. It's all very deep and well thought out stuff. He loves puzzles and games. One artwork consisted solely of equations and clues to what his next piece would be. How awesome is that!! I would love to view his work in a gallery and be confused and then sit down and work it out like a math problem, it's as if his artwork is playing the role of the teacher, and we are it's students, waiting to learn.
Obviously he prefers doing pieces that confuse and overwhelm the heck out of his viewers, whether it be paintints installations or what not. And they may seem abstract from a distance but upon closer inspection you notice a set of instructions/rules/keys to decode his pieces. And, he describes his relationships with the galleries as a partner who brings complementary strengths and creative differences to the relationship.
1. What got you started into such complex pieces that require a key to understand it?
2. Are you ocncerned about the longetivity of your work?
3. Has anyone ever complained to you about how complex and hard your artwork it to understand?
1. Does he prefer doing installations or paintings?
2. Are his pieces abstract?
3. What is your relationships with the galleries?
I like how his artwork has different functions, as in to teach and entice us to participate. It's also very complex that is usually overwhelms the viewers, he showcases and extends his audience with so much information we cant soak it all in. It's fascinating. Here's a guy who has ambition. He will stop at nothing to get and learn and do what he wants. "He wants everything." I like how he incorporates this idea of "everything" into his artwork. He starts with the time before the big bang and then works from there. How exactly does one do that with out their head exploding. Where do you begin to make such artwork, thats a lot of research.
I also think it's fascinating that he presents a key to each of his pieces. It's almost like a game, its how to unlock the meaning behind his work and for work so complex and intertwined with information, a key isnt such a bad idea. I would love to sit in front of one of his works and try to decode it and break it down, discover the meanind behind the artwork. I also like how he uses characters to narrate the universe's evolution since the birth of time.
I like he he creates "epic tales" through his artwork. And also how it takes place no where, there are no boundaries of limits holding it down, it is what it wants and needs to be. It's all very deep and well thought out stuff. He loves puzzles and games. One artwork consisted solely of equations and clues to what his next piece would be. How awesome is that!! I would love to view his work in a gallery and be confused and then sit down and work it out like a math problem, it's as if his artwork is playing the role of the teacher, and we are it's students, waiting to learn.
Obviously he prefers doing pieces that confuse and overwhelm the heck out of his viewers, whether it be paintints installations or what not. And they may seem abstract from a distance but upon closer inspection you notice a set of instructions/rules/keys to decode his pieces. And, he describes his relationships with the galleries as a partner who brings complementary strengths and creative differences to the relationship.
1. What got you started into such complex pieces that require a key to understand it?
2. Are you ocncerned about the longetivity of your work?
3. Has anyone ever complained to you about how complex and hard your artwork it to understand?
William Kentridge
1. Why did you choose to stick with the same media for most of you artwork?
2. Do you always use the same character in all of your pieces?
3. When did you first realize that you were probably going to become a recognized artist?
I like how his emotional inspiration isn't within himself, like most artists, but observed in the world. It shows selflessness which is a rare attribute to find in most people nowadays. He must be teeming with inspiration though because he lives in South Africa where he can witness abusement of government, people, rights, etc...it's all there.
"The main complaint is dealing with the distress that lingers even after the abuses have ceased." Obviously he has seen a lot in his life and it has affected him greatly. I like how his artwork has the quality of sketches but then certain parts of his drawings are so detailed it's creepy. As in the piece History of the Main Complaint, the eyes looking back in the rearview mirror look earily accurate and realistic. His pieces almost have a horro feel/look to them in part due to the media he uses.
The use of charcoal really adds to his artwork, especially when making movies. Because charcoal is never really permanent, when making movies, frame by frame, I would imagine that some parts would smudge, creativng texture and unintentionally adding more to his pieces, I think that's part of the process. People may be smudged and it will in turn look as if a memory is disappearing.
He doesnt always used the same character, it's just the same character, Soho, for one of his films. I think he chooses to stick with the same media, charcoal, because it works for him, it adds to his artwork, allowing his to constantly change his pieces and it in turn gives a nice texture and variety. And the point that made him realize that he was going to be an artist was when he realized that the one thing that he had ever been good at and that ever made him money was drawing.
1. Why do you choose to stay in South Africa, why not come to America? If you did, do you think the style of your artwork would change?
2. Have you ever considered using others forms of media for your artwork?
3. Are you happy with the way your life turned out, with being an artist?
1. Why did you choose to stick with the same media for most of you artwork?
2. Do you always use the same character in all of your pieces?
3. When did you first realize that you were probably going to become a recognized artist?
I like how his emotional inspiration isn't within himself, like most artists, but observed in the world. It shows selflessness which is a rare attribute to find in most people nowadays. He must be teeming with inspiration though because he lives in South Africa where he can witness abusement of government, people, rights, etc...it's all there.
"The main complaint is dealing with the distress that lingers even after the abuses have ceased." Obviously he has seen a lot in his life and it has affected him greatly. I like how his artwork has the quality of sketches but then certain parts of his drawings are so detailed it's creepy. As in the piece History of the Main Complaint, the eyes looking back in the rearview mirror look earily accurate and realistic. His pieces almost have a horro feel/look to them in part due to the media he uses.
The use of charcoal really adds to his artwork, especially when making movies. Because charcoal is never really permanent, when making movies, frame by frame, I would imagine that some parts would smudge, creativng texture and unintentionally adding more to his pieces, I think that's part of the process. People may be smudged and it will in turn look as if a memory is disappearing.
He doesnt always used the same character, it's just the same character, Soho, for one of his films. I think he chooses to stick with the same media, charcoal, because it works for him, it adds to his artwork, allowing his to constantly change his pieces and it in turn gives a nice texture and variety. And the point that made him realize that he was going to be an artist was when he realized that the one thing that he had ever been good at and that ever made him money was drawing.
1. Why do you choose to stay in South Africa, why not come to America? If you did, do you think the style of your artwork would change?
2. Have you ever considered using others forms of media for your artwork?
3. Are you happy with the way your life turned out, with being an artist?
Yukinori Yanagi
1. What is your fascination between humans and animals? Which do you pity more?
2. What gave you the idea to make an ant farm to demonstrate different countires powers?
3. How long have you been an artist?
An ant? Of all creatures. It really is fascinating learning about what modern artists are creating these days. I like how they talked about the artist being the only one that gets fatigued during the process and not the ant, who was the one who was kidnapped. Honestly, why would he ever choose an ant to incoporate into his work? But regardless, the pieces are astonishing and shows just how much effort and energy he puts into his work. I would love to see the finished piece of the Wandering Postion. I also wonder if he accumulated any back problems after doing the piece. Being hunched over for that many days can give any one a problem.
Another piece was the ant farm and this is one that will change and develop over time which I think is amazing. I would love to see this piece periodically and document it's changes, which Im sure the artist is doing. It's interesting how he choose flags and what more, why did he choose the countries he did. I think he's trying to symoblize how whether we choose to believe it or not, all countries are connected whether physically, socially or econically. We are all on the same planet so should all get along. But that will never happen.
I think that he chooses to pity humans more, we are worn down more easily because of our negatively ever growing society and are becoming more and more antisocial and lazy. Animals are strong and persistant and dont have their priorities blocked by other issues, they work as a team. I think he just likes the differences and similarities between humans and animals and likes to compare the two's lifestyle. I cant answer the other two questions.
1. Why did you choose an ant to incorporate into your work?
2. How many days did you follow the path of the ant?
3. What do you find most interesting about the ant?
1. What is your fascination between humans and animals? Which do you pity more?
2. What gave you the idea to make an ant farm to demonstrate different countires powers?
3. How long have you been an artist?
An ant? Of all creatures. It really is fascinating learning about what modern artists are creating these days. I like how they talked about the artist being the only one that gets fatigued during the process and not the ant, who was the one who was kidnapped. Honestly, why would he ever choose an ant to incoporate into his work? But regardless, the pieces are astonishing and shows just how much effort and energy he puts into his work. I would love to see the finished piece of the Wandering Postion. I also wonder if he accumulated any back problems after doing the piece. Being hunched over for that many days can give any one a problem.
Another piece was the ant farm and this is one that will change and develop over time which I think is amazing. I would love to see this piece periodically and document it's changes, which Im sure the artist is doing. It's interesting how he choose flags and what more, why did he choose the countries he did. I think he's trying to symoblize how whether we choose to believe it or not, all countries are connected whether physically, socially or econically. We are all on the same planet so should all get along. But that will never happen.
I think that he chooses to pity humans more, we are worn down more easily because of our negatively ever growing society and are becoming more and more antisocial and lazy. Animals are strong and persistant and dont have their priorities blocked by other issues, they work as a team. I think he just likes the differences and similarities between humans and animals and likes to compare the two's lifestyle. I cant answer the other two questions.
1. Why did you choose an ant to incorporate into your work?
2. How many days did you follow the path of the ant?
3. What do you find most interesting about the ant?
Saturday, March 1, 2008
ARTISTS ARTISTS ARTISTS
Anarldo Morales
1. What made you decide to make pieces that physically interact with viewers?
2. Do you get more praise or complaints about your artwork?
3. Do you like to get punished?
First of all, the dude got shot in the head and lived. He’s like a superhuman!! I think that he has to be one of my favorite artists that I have learned about in this class. That fact that he became fascinated with fear and pain and decided to incorporate this running theme into all of his work is very brave. I also like how he did research and put himself in danger by living in a dangerous environment all for the sake of art and gaining a better understanding of it. He risked his life and enjoyed the experience immensely. That fact that he is so dedicated to learning new things about the human psyche is amazing.
I would love to go to one of his exhibitions and interact with his work. I love the rush of anticipation and fear which brings a mix of excitement. That’s why people love horror movies so much, they love being scared and knowing that they cant get hurt. IT’s a win win situation and that’s what he provides his viewers. I think it’s interesting how he is so adament in learning about human feelings and how they combine and mix which contrasting emotions. All because of his near death experience. That is just so empowering and inspirational. To commit his life to research and explore the human emotions.
I want to get squirted in the fce and electrocuted and feel like I might get hurt if I get too close to his pieces but still want to get closer. Curiostiy is a weird thing. Humans are naturally curious and apparently, anarldo has always been curios, resulting and plenty of near death experiences. I’ve always been fascinated by how things work, machinery and inventions. When I was a kid I wanted to be an inventor and invented crazy impratical things but I grew out of that phase, but I still have the interest. That’s why I like his work so much. As a kid he was always exploring and taking things apart, I can relate to that. Also, my dad works with computers and takes them apart and rebuilds them so I think that contributed to my interests.
All in all, I will be looking up more about this artist and hopefully in the future I will be able to go to one of his exhibitions. It turns out that most people enjoy his work rather than complain, like I knew would be the outcome because like I said, people enjoy the apprehension when it comes to the thought of danger. And he doesn’t like the thought of punishment, that’s not the purpose of his work, it’s to leanr more about human emotions and what evokes them.
1. What made you choose to go to live in peurto rico of all dangerous places to live? Is that where your roots are?
2. What is your favorite piece?
3. What is your favorite reaction our of a viewer? Do you have more than one? And has anyone ever threatened you due to one of your pieces?
1. What made you decide to make pieces that physically interact with viewers?
2. Do you get more praise or complaints about your artwork?
3. Do you like to get punished?
First of all, the dude got shot in the head and lived. He’s like a superhuman!! I think that he has to be one of my favorite artists that I have learned about in this class. That fact that he became fascinated with fear and pain and decided to incorporate this running theme into all of his work is very brave. I also like how he did research and put himself in danger by living in a dangerous environment all for the sake of art and gaining a better understanding of it. He risked his life and enjoyed the experience immensely. That fact that he is so dedicated to learning new things about the human psyche is amazing.
I would love to go to one of his exhibitions and interact with his work. I love the rush of anticipation and fear which brings a mix of excitement. That’s why people love horror movies so much, they love being scared and knowing that they cant get hurt. IT’s a win win situation and that’s what he provides his viewers. I think it’s interesting how he is so adament in learning about human feelings and how they combine and mix which contrasting emotions. All because of his near death experience. That is just so empowering and inspirational. To commit his life to research and explore the human emotions.
I want to get squirted in the fce and electrocuted and feel like I might get hurt if I get too close to his pieces but still want to get closer. Curiostiy is a weird thing. Humans are naturally curious and apparently, anarldo has always been curios, resulting and plenty of near death experiences. I’ve always been fascinated by how things work, machinery and inventions. When I was a kid I wanted to be an inventor and invented crazy impratical things but I grew out of that phase, but I still have the interest. That’s why I like his work so much. As a kid he was always exploring and taking things apart, I can relate to that. Also, my dad works with computers and takes them apart and rebuilds them so I think that contributed to my interests.
All in all, I will be looking up more about this artist and hopefully in the future I will be able to go to one of his exhibitions. It turns out that most people enjoy his work rather than complain, like I knew would be the outcome because like I said, people enjoy the apprehension when it comes to the thought of danger. And he doesn’t like the thought of punishment, that’s not the purpose of his work, it’s to leanr more about human emotions and what evokes them.
1. What made you choose to go to live in peurto rico of all dangerous places to live? Is that where your roots are?
2. What is your favorite piece?
3. What is your favorite reaction our of a viewer? Do you have more than one? And has anyone ever threatened you due to one of your pieces?
Daniel Joseph Martinez
1. How do you feel in America, do you feel like an equal, like the racial issue is controlled?
2. How important is equality to you?
3. Have you always felt that people have dealt fairly with you?
The castle is burning was an interesting piece. I knew that he would be an artist intent on making us aware of how our government is messed up and how racial issues aren’t being dealt with properly. I thought it was interesting how he put it there knowing it would cause a stir and problems. I bet he wanted it to, he wanted people to be aware how racial our country really is. That was the pieces purpose. The title was perfect as well. Clever man.
Also, I was waiting for a artist to be a non conformist artist, one who doesn’t want to make art to sell or make it to be enjoyed visually. He wants to make people think, conjure up thoughts and questions. When he is invited to galleries, he goes all out and tries to make a statement. That’s bravery right there. Im surprised the governemtn hasn’t been involved, but then again im not, because he has those freedoms that are guaranteed to Americans.
I think the racial issue is ridiculous. I cant comprehend why it is even an issue. Who cares about the color of the skin, it does not mean we think and act differently. Every person is a person, no matter what they look like. Racists have always bothered me, but we can thank te media for expanding the idea of racism, movies and what not. People like to do what they are told when they are entertained, if a celebrity is making racist omments, then they want to too. CANT WE ALL JUST GET ALONG!!
He wants radicalism. He is so dedicated to his beliefs. He wants to make a statement, he wants change to come around. I cant imagine every praising negative reviews like they did on his exhibition in new york with the museum tags. But that’s what he wanted!! He wanted to take a stand, crazy!
Evidently, equality and racism are a big part of his life and ideals. They affect him greatly and you can see that in almost all of his work. He wants to make a difference, make people think and stand up for what they believe.
1. Do you ever worry about your safety when making all of these pieces on racism?
2. Why do you think that racism is still a big deal in America, do you think it will ever go away?
3. Would you ever have a gallery or exhibition that didn’t create controversy?
1. How do you feel in America, do you feel like an equal, like the racial issue is controlled?
2. How important is equality to you?
3. Have you always felt that people have dealt fairly with you?
The castle is burning was an interesting piece. I knew that he would be an artist intent on making us aware of how our government is messed up and how racial issues aren’t being dealt with properly. I thought it was interesting how he put it there knowing it would cause a stir and problems. I bet he wanted it to, he wanted people to be aware how racial our country really is. That was the pieces purpose. The title was perfect as well. Clever man.
Also, I was waiting for a artist to be a non conformist artist, one who doesn’t want to make art to sell or make it to be enjoyed visually. He wants to make people think, conjure up thoughts and questions. When he is invited to galleries, he goes all out and tries to make a statement. That’s bravery right there. Im surprised the governemtn hasn’t been involved, but then again im not, because he has those freedoms that are guaranteed to Americans.
I think the racial issue is ridiculous. I cant comprehend why it is even an issue. Who cares about the color of the skin, it does not mean we think and act differently. Every person is a person, no matter what they look like. Racists have always bothered me, but we can thank te media for expanding the idea of racism, movies and what not. People like to do what they are told when they are entertained, if a celebrity is making racist omments, then they want to too. CANT WE ALL JUST GET ALONG!!
He wants radicalism. He is so dedicated to his beliefs. He wants to make a statement, he wants change to come around. I cant imagine every praising negative reviews like they did on his exhibition in new york with the museum tags. But that’s what he wanted!! He wanted to take a stand, crazy!
Evidently, equality and racism are a big part of his life and ideals. They affect him greatly and you can see that in almost all of his work. He wants to make a difference, make people think and stand up for what they believe.
1. Do you ever worry about your safety when making all of these pieces on racism?
2. Why do you think that racism is still a big deal in America, do you think it will ever go away?
3. Would you ever have a gallery or exhibition that didn’t create controversy?
Julian LaVerdiere
1. What is his favorite piece of artwork that he has created?
2. What are his inspirations?
3. How does he manage to have constant inspiration?
I can’t even imagine what it must be like to have constant inspiration, ever flowing. I would think that would be overwhelming, I wouldn’t be able to cope with all of it and trying to organize my thoughts to make artwork. All I know is this guy must have a lot of patience and love for art and work. Also, he sets really high ambitions for himself; to be the modern day faust! The best of luck to him, I hope he succeeds.
I also like how history is important to him, it fascinates, intrigues him. He wants everyone to be aware of its importance. I’m guessing that he likes to incorporate historical ideas into his work? His piece about the cable crossing was interesting. HE does have a point about people’s interest. No one fully appreciates a lot of the extravagant work that scientists have done in the past and present. It’s all about Hollywood, celebrities. People like to be entertained. Events that are life changing never get enough credit as they should, such as the dawning of the communication era. HE knows his history.
I want one of his dream generating devices. Those sound awesome! A device that can conjure up images of flying , yes please!! I love that he wants to give people the feeling of freedom and strength through these special pillows and what not. OMG, his DVD is genius. That is very true, it’s the anticipation, the build up before the revealing that is always the most exciting, but once it has come to pass, it has little force. I love that he didn’t title it, it exemplifies the mystery, and also that it is never ending, you never get to see what’s inside the safe. That way, you are always on your toes, also inspired and waiting, always intrigued. Very clever Julian!
I must admit that I did not know that the two beams of light rising in the twin towers palce was done by an artist, julian specifically. That makes me respect him even more. I always thought those lights were beautiful and the meaning and inspiration and hope behind it and that it gave people was really inspiring.
1. When did he realize that he enjoyed history so much, that it would be a part of his work?
2. How do you feel about commercial art, are you for or against it?
3. How much time do you spend in your studio? Since you have ever flowing inspiration, do you spend most of your time there?
1. What is his favorite piece of artwork that he has created?
2. What are his inspirations?
3. How does he manage to have constant inspiration?
I can’t even imagine what it must be like to have constant inspiration, ever flowing. I would think that would be overwhelming, I wouldn’t be able to cope with all of it and trying to organize my thoughts to make artwork. All I know is this guy must have a lot of patience and love for art and work. Also, he sets really high ambitions for himself; to be the modern day faust! The best of luck to him, I hope he succeeds.
I also like how history is important to him, it fascinates, intrigues him. He wants everyone to be aware of its importance. I’m guessing that he likes to incorporate historical ideas into his work? His piece about the cable crossing was interesting. HE does have a point about people’s interest. No one fully appreciates a lot of the extravagant work that scientists have done in the past and present. It’s all about Hollywood, celebrities. People like to be entertained. Events that are life changing never get enough credit as they should, such as the dawning of the communication era. HE knows his history.
I want one of his dream generating devices. Those sound awesome! A device that can conjure up images of flying , yes please!! I love that he wants to give people the feeling of freedom and strength through these special pillows and what not. OMG, his DVD is genius. That is very true, it’s the anticipation, the build up before the revealing that is always the most exciting, but once it has come to pass, it has little force. I love that he didn’t title it, it exemplifies the mystery, and also that it is never ending, you never get to see what’s inside the safe. That way, you are always on your toes, also inspired and waiting, always intrigued. Very clever Julian!
I must admit that I did not know that the two beams of light rising in the twin towers palce was done by an artist, julian specifically. That makes me respect him even more. I always thought those lights were beautiful and the meaning and inspiration and hope behind it and that it gave people was really inspiring.
1. When did he realize that he enjoyed history so much, that it would be a part of his work?
2. How do you feel about commercial art, are you for or against it?
3. How much time do you spend in your studio? Since you have ever flowing inspiration, do you spend most of your time there?
Friday, February 29, 2008
Kim Jones
1. What got him into the arts as a career choice?
2. Why is he so fascinated with the alter ego?
3. Does he incorporate humans into all of his work?
It’s weird seeing an artist whose main focus is own his alter ego called mudman because just the other day a student did his identity piece on his alter ego. Funny, I’ve never even thought of my own alter ego, I’ve never even thought or knew or believed I had one. Who knows, maybe everyone does have one.
So, it’s pretty wicked that he uses himself as the artform, the final product. Talk about a dedicated artist. HE covers himself with mud and imposes physical strain on himself, and all for the cause of art. Obsession or dedication? I think a little of both. But when you consider his past, the polio and time spent in Vietnam, mudman becomes to make a little more sense, become more clear. These two times in his life are a combination that make up mudman. Everyone who knows anything about the Vietnam war knows it was one of Americas worst wars, losing a lot of soldiers. The soldiers that did live were to live hard, stressful lives after, dealing with horrible nightmares and memories of the war.
It’s also impressive how he becomes mudman for a whole day and walks around in urban areas. This provides as an interesting contrast between materials, nature vs. urban. What a contrast. Also, considering his past, mudman begins to become an appropriate alter ego for Jones. That is quite a switch from the military to an artist. Talk about a transformation.
I really am not aware about his choosing as an artist straight out of the military and he is so fascinated with his alter ego because as a child, he was coped up in the house due to polio and the vivid growth of his lonely imagination combined with future traumatizing experiences later combined to give him mudman. And he actually started as a painter then got into sculpture but rather than traditional sculptures he chose to use his body.
1. What is his purpose in walking around public as mudman, does it have a meaning?
2. Why does he choose to put his body through some form of suffering and abuse?
3. Why exactly did he switch from becoming a painter to a sculptor?
1. What got him into the arts as a career choice?
2. Why is he so fascinated with the alter ego?
3. Does he incorporate humans into all of his work?
It’s weird seeing an artist whose main focus is own his alter ego called mudman because just the other day a student did his identity piece on his alter ego. Funny, I’ve never even thought of my own alter ego, I’ve never even thought or knew or believed I had one. Who knows, maybe everyone does have one.
So, it’s pretty wicked that he uses himself as the artform, the final product. Talk about a dedicated artist. HE covers himself with mud and imposes physical strain on himself, and all for the cause of art. Obsession or dedication? I think a little of both. But when you consider his past, the polio and time spent in Vietnam, mudman becomes to make a little more sense, become more clear. These two times in his life are a combination that make up mudman. Everyone who knows anything about the Vietnam war knows it was one of Americas worst wars, losing a lot of soldiers. The soldiers that did live were to live hard, stressful lives after, dealing with horrible nightmares and memories of the war.
It’s also impressive how he becomes mudman for a whole day and walks around in urban areas. This provides as an interesting contrast between materials, nature vs. urban. What a contrast. Also, considering his past, mudman begins to become an appropriate alter ego for Jones. That is quite a switch from the military to an artist. Talk about a transformation.
I really am not aware about his choosing as an artist straight out of the military and he is so fascinated with his alter ego because as a child, he was coped up in the house due to polio and the vivid growth of his lonely imagination combined with future traumatizing experiences later combined to give him mudman. And he actually started as a painter then got into sculpture but rather than traditional sculptures he chose to use his body.
1. What is his purpose in walking around public as mudman, does it have a meaning?
2. Why does he choose to put his body through some form of suffering and abuse?
3. Why exactly did he switch from becoming a painter to a sculptor?
Scott Grieger
1. What is his connection to the military, if any?
2. How has he struggled as an artist?
3. Does he have his own studio?
I wish I could be inspired by everyday, random traditions and what not like him. I think it’s neat how he transforms these experiences into artwork. His inspirations are so simple that most people wouldn’t even think twice before considering such things as artistic inspiration, more would consider it trash. A nike shoe box? Awesome.
He makes a very good point, most of our lives are reflected throught the choices of a single individual, we have very few choices as individuals. Swooshtika!! That is frickin awesome! What a cool idea to combine such two powerful symbols and make another image. Corporations vs. dictatorial government, there is some correlation yes. “I make circles out of bar graphs” haha, this guy is crazy creative. Once again, his installation of this swooshtika’s gave their meaning even more emphasis. And now he incorporates religion into the swooshtika’s through the use of fabric. Talk about one artist who does his research and one who keeps up with politics. Political artists have always intrigued me.
Now there’s Dharmy!! I must admit, I love his play on words. I can completely connect with his when talking about the distand boom and sounds of the military world. I have always lived near or even next to, or IN a military base, so I have grown used to such sounds and disturbances. It was interesting how he connected the two, Dharma and army. I love how he incorporated all of these different, opposite ideas that contrast eachother extremely, and combined them into one installation. Most would not think this would be successful, but he pulled it off.
As for answering my three questions, his connection to the military was that he lived next to a base in the middle of no where and he was frequently disturbed. He claimed that his main struggle is actually making his thoughts, concepts, come to life, making, creating them. And of course he has a studio, why wouldn’t he.
1. Would have ever or has he ever done a piece that focused on one issue, instead of combing two issues into one piece?
2. Do you think back now and wish that you had done something different with your life?
3. Where do you prefer to live, in the wild or in a metropolitan area?
1. What is his connection to the military, if any?
2. How has he struggled as an artist?
3. Does he have his own studio?
I wish I could be inspired by everyday, random traditions and what not like him. I think it’s neat how he transforms these experiences into artwork. His inspirations are so simple that most people wouldn’t even think twice before considering such things as artistic inspiration, more would consider it trash. A nike shoe box? Awesome.
He makes a very good point, most of our lives are reflected throught the choices of a single individual, we have very few choices as individuals. Swooshtika!! That is frickin awesome! What a cool idea to combine such two powerful symbols and make another image. Corporations vs. dictatorial government, there is some correlation yes. “I make circles out of bar graphs” haha, this guy is crazy creative. Once again, his installation of this swooshtika’s gave their meaning even more emphasis. And now he incorporates religion into the swooshtika’s through the use of fabric. Talk about one artist who does his research and one who keeps up with politics. Political artists have always intrigued me.
Now there’s Dharmy!! I must admit, I love his play on words. I can completely connect with his when talking about the distand boom and sounds of the military world. I have always lived near or even next to, or IN a military base, so I have grown used to such sounds and disturbances. It was interesting how he connected the two, Dharma and army. I love how he incorporated all of these different, opposite ideas that contrast eachother extremely, and combined them into one installation. Most would not think this would be successful, but he pulled it off.
As for answering my three questions, his connection to the military was that he lived next to a base in the middle of no where and he was frequently disturbed. He claimed that his main struggle is actually making his thoughts, concepts, come to life, making, creating them. And of course he has a studio, why wouldn’t he.
1. Would have ever or has he ever done a piece that focused on one issue, instead of combing two issues into one piece?
2. Do you think back now and wish that you had done something different with your life?
3. Where do you prefer to live, in the wild or in a metropolitan area?
Tuesday, January 15, 2008
first text c.
intro
"the population of artists increases and competition becomes an unavoidable component of the art profession."
that just makes going into this field all the more nerve-wracking. because of the lack of limits concerning art, the range of interest is expanding..there are no rules! The ultimate form of expression, creativity..the present is the best AND worst time to be an artist.
"artists face uncertain fates"
a tad morbid but with a look back, very true in a lot of cases. unfortunately enough. Art is full of chances, observations, knowledge, growth...
scoping an audience
"like a battery that is fully charged but not in service"
great analogy between the link of production and consumption.
I know it's crucial for an artist to focus and put some thought into their intended audience. That, i suppose is something (among many others) I must work on.
sourcing inspiration
it's critical to do research and put yourself out there and explore other artists work. Take ideas from them and combine them with other influences to create your own unique style. We will be doing research for the rest of our life so we might as well make a habit of it now.
"the population of artists increases and competition becomes an unavoidable component of the art profession."
that just makes going into this field all the more nerve-wracking. because of the lack of limits concerning art, the range of interest is expanding..there are no rules! The ultimate form of expression, creativity..the present is the best AND worst time to be an artist.
"artists face uncertain fates"
a tad morbid but with a look back, very true in a lot of cases. unfortunately enough. Art is full of chances, observations, knowledge, growth...
scoping an audience
"like a battery that is fully charged but not in service"
great analogy between the link of production and consumption.
I know it's crucial for an artist to focus and put some thought into their intended audience. That, i suppose is something (among many others) I must work on.
sourcing inspiration
it's critical to do research and put yourself out there and explore other artists work. Take ideas from them and combine them with other influences to create your own unique style. We will be doing research for the rest of our life so we might as well make a habit of it now.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)